Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01127
Original file (PD2013 01127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD 13-01127
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140114
SEPARATION DATE: 20030821


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (98GLQB/Voice Intercept Operator) medically separated for diabetes. The CI was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM), type I in early 2003. Due to her requirement for treatment with insulin, she could not deploy although she continued to perform well in garrison. Accordingly, the condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). She was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The condition, characterized as “diabetes type I requiring insulin” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded an abnormal pap smear for PEB adjudication as medically acceptable. The Informal PEB adjudicated “diabetes mellitus type I” as unfitting, rated 20%. The remaining condition w as determined to be not unfitting and not rated. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Type I Diabetes.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Service rating for the unfitting diabetes condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20030618
 VA* - (3 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Diabetes Mellitus, Type I 7913 20% Diabetes Mellitus, Type I 7913 40% 20031106
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 9 20031106
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 50%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 40129 (most proximate to date of separation)


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Diabetes Mellitus, Type I. The CI was evaluated on 16 January 2003 for a one month history of polydipsia (excessive thirst), polyuria (excessive urination), but without polyphagia (increased eating.) She also reported a five pound weight loss and fatigue. DM was suspected and a fasting blood sugar was 210, well above normal. Type I DM, was diagnosed, confirmed by serologic testing, and she was begun on insulin and a diabetic diet and entered into the MEB process. During the stabilization process, she was excused from physical fitness training. This is a normal precaution for newly diagnosed diabetics. Diabetic complications such as retinopathy (damage to the retina of the eye), neuropathy (damage or disease affecting nerves), and nephropathy (damage to or disease of a kidney) were not present. The narrative summary (NARSUM) noted that the CI had not had any episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or when the human body cannot use sugar (glucose) as a fuel source because there is no insulin or not enough insulin . On physical examination, the funduscopic (eye exam) and neurological ( nervous system) examinations were normal. Laboratory values, including renal (kidney) function tests, were normal other than a blood sugar of 203. It was determined that she did not meet retention standards secondary to the use of insulin for control of DM and she was issued a permanent P3 profile. Restrictions included no operations of heavy machinery, trucks, (and) aircraft (or) working at heights. No scuba diving. No formal PT when (her) blood glucose was greater than 250. At that time, these restrictions were typical of those given to anyone with DM requiring insulin.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed just under three months after separation, the CI reported that she had never been hospitalized for DM nor had there been a history of DKA. She had hypoglycemic (abnormally low levels of blood sugar) episodes several times a week. She did not have a caloric restriction and denied complications. No regulation of activities was documented. On examination, her funduscopic and neurological examinations were unremarkable. The Board did note that on an 8 November 2012 DM questionnaire, the examiner specifically answered “no” to the question of regulation of activities. The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA both coded the condition as 7913, diabetes mellitus, and rated it at 20% and 40%, respectively. The difference between the two ratings hinges upon “regulation of activities.” The Board found no evidence that any activities were limited beyond those limitations given to anyone on insulin. Hence, the criteria for the higher 40% rating were determined by the Board to have not been met. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the DM condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the DM condition and IAW VASRD §4.119, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Diabetes Mellitus, Type I 7913 20%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130813, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




         XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
         President
         Physical Disability Board of Review

SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140005197 (PD201301127)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02242

    Original file (PD-2013-02242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20050831 The MEB examiner documented that the CI could not do unlimited running, walking, biking or swimming and further opined that she should not be allowed to operate heavy equipment.The Board considered the 20% rating versus a 40% rating (requiring insulin, restricted diet and regulation of activities).After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the DM Type I...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02244

    Original file (PD-2013-02244.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20091009VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Diabetes Mellitus, Type I791320%Diabetes Mellitus, Type I791320%**STROther x 1 (Not in Scope)Other x 0STR Combined: 20%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100226 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01466

    Original file (PD 2014 01466.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20090426 The CI was still taking oral medications only (no injected insulin) and had undergone surgery in March 2008 (Abdominoplasty) with continued high blood sugar levels (glucose 262 with normal 74-106) and high Glycosolated hemoglobin levels (A1C 9.5 with normal 4.2-7.0). I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00301

    Original file (PD2011-00301.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “After 6.5 years dedicated to the Service of the Air Force (4 at USAFA and 2.5 full-time active), I was determined unfit physically due to the onset of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Unfitting Condition: DM Type I Condition . Therefore, the Board determined that neither condition could be argued as unfitting at the time of separation from Service and subject to separation rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00736

    Original file (PD2012-00736.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I have to take shots 4 times a day, strenuous activities cause me to have periods of hypoglycemia at work and during various activities outside of work. The PEB rated the CI’s Type 1 DM, requiring Insulin and restricted diet coded 7913 DM at 20%. The CI contended that he requires regulation of activity in order to control his DM.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01132

    Original file (PD-2013-01132.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. It is appropriately coded 7913, and IAW VASRD §4.119, meets criteria for the 60% rating level due to requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities; with an episode of ketoacidosis, which required hospitalization, plus complications that would not be compensable if separately evaluated. In the CI’s treatment record, there was not sufficient...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00957

    Original file (PD-2014-00957.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Diabetes Mellitus Type 1791320%Diabetes Mellitus I791320%20080923Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x1 Combined: 20%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01036

    Original file (PD 2012 01036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA Rating Decision (VARD) of June 2005 indicated a civilian medical report indicating fluctuating blood sugars, increased insulin requirements and required regulation of activities due to diabetes. The VA increased their rating to 40% effective May 2005 (30 months after separation) based on that evidence. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01445

    Original file (PD2012-01445.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated with a 20% disability rating. CI CONTENTION: “The 20% rating does not fit the disability, Type I Diabetes with controlled diet, restricted activities, and insulin dependent starts at the 40% rating. 3 PD1201445 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00227

    Original file (PD2013 00227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20031216 The eye and neurological evaluations were normal.The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB and VA both coded the condition as 7913, DM, and rated it at 20% for the use of Insulin without regulation of activities. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.